Official civil aviation documents indicate that Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes and his wife, lawyer Viviane Barci de Moraes, took at least eight flights on aircraft connected to banker Daniel Vorcaro between May and October 2025
Vorcaro, former owner of Banco Master, was arrested in Operation Compliance Zero, which investigates fraud and financial irregularities.
Most of these trips-seven flights-were made on jets belonging to Prime Aviation, a luxury asset sharing firm linked to the Patrimonial Blue fund, of which Vorcaro was a partner.
These aircraft have regular authorization to operate as air taxis.
The eighth flight, registered on August 7, 2025, was made on a Dassault Falcon 2000 jet, owned by the company FSW SPE.
Among the partners in this aircraft is Fabiano Zettel, Vorcaro’s brother-in-law, who was also arrested in the same operation and is negotiating a possible plea bargain with the Attorney General’s Office and the Federal Police.
The information came from a cross-referencing of records from the National Civil Aviation Agency (ANAC), the Department of Airspace Control (DECEA), and the Brazilian Aeronautical Registry, according to a report in Folha de S.Paulo.
Minister Alexandre de Moraes’s office vehemently denied the information.
In a statement, it classified the report as “fanciful” and stated that the minister “never traveled on any plane belonging to Daniel Vorcaro or his company, nor to Fabiano Zettel, whom he does not even know.”
s.
Viviane Barci de Moraes’s law firm explained that it contracts air taxi services from various companies, including Prime Aviation, as a form of compensation for legal fees.
According to the statement, none of the flights involved Vorcaro or Zettel, there were no personal ties, and no lawyer from the firm knows Fabiano Zettel or has traveled on planes directly linked to him or his brother-in-law.
Daniel Vorcaro’s defense stated that it would not comment on the matter.
Prime Aviation, in turn, stated that it does not comment on client information for reasons of confidentiality and data protection.
The case is generating public debate about possible relationships between judicial authorities and investigated businessmen, although the parties involved deny any irregularity or personal contact.
To date, there is no record of a formal investigation into these flight
Published in 04/01/2026 12h25
Text adapted by AI (Grok) and translated via Google API in the English version. Images from public image libraries or credits in the caption.
Reference article: