{"id":1055,"date":"2026-04-09T05:48:16","date_gmt":"2026-04-09T05:48:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/iustitia.com.br\/en\/?page_id=1055"},"modified":"2026-04-09T05:48:16","modified_gmt":"2026-04-09T05:48:16","slug":"a-pressa-do-stf-em-limitar-delacoes-premiadas-e-a-aposta-no-esquecimento-popular","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/iustitia.com.br\/en\/?page_id=1055","title":{"rendered":"The brazilian supreme court&#8217;s haste in limiting plea bargains and betting on &#8216;popular forgetfulness&#8217;"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure><img decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/vendedoradesonhos.com.br\/upload\/1\/sites\/26\/img_41921_1200.png\" alt=\"\" style=\"width:100%\"><figcaption>Justice<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div><hr><\/p><p>\r\n\t<a href='http:\/\/iustitia.com.br\/en\"s=justice'>#Justice<\/a><\/p><p><\/p><p>\r\n\t<strong>The Attempt to Hide and Protect: The &#8220;Good&#8221; Plea Bargain vs.<\/p><p>\r\nthe &#8220;Dangerous&#8221; Plea Bargain<\/strong><\/p><p>The lawyer from Paran\u00c3\u00a1, Edison V.<\/p><p>\r\nCampos, highlights a clear contradiction.<\/p><p>\r\nWhen the plea bargain involved Mauro Cid (former aide to Jair Bolsonaro), the system used imprisonment, maximum pressure, and even threats to his family to &#8220;extract cooperation.&#8221; At that time, the plea bargain was seen as a legitimate instrument.<\/p><p>\r\nNow, however, with the possibility of a plea bargain (mentioned in the video in the second post) that could &#8220;touch&#8221; Minister Alexandre de Moraes, there is a &#8220;rush&#8221; to vote on a 2021 action that limits the effects of plea bargains.\r\n<\/p><p>\r\nThe text of the post is clear: &#8220;Sorry, but this has nothing to do with defending guarantees; it&#8217;s blatant casuistry.&#8221; And it concludes that this type of &#8220;scoundrelism&#8221; destroys Brazilians&#8217; trust in the country.\r\n<\/p><p>\r\nBrazilian Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes has approved the Workers&#8217; Party&#8217;s (PT) request for the Supreme Court to vote on &#8220;limits for plea bargains.&#8221; Justice Fachin still needs to set a date.<\/p><p>\r\nThe report reinforces the urgency of judging an old case precisely at a time when new plea bargains could affect the highest levels of the Judiciary.<\/p><p>\r\nThere is no mention of any generic concern with &#8220;constitutional guarantees&#8221;-the focus is practical and immediate.\r\n<\/p><p>\r\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure><blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-media-max-width=\"560\"><p lang=\"pt\" dir=\"ltr\">Quando a dela\u00c3\u00a7\u00c3\u00a3o era a de Mauro Cid, valeu pris\u00c3\u00a3o, press\u00c3\u00a3o m\u00c3\u00a1xima e at\u00c3\u00a9 amea\u00c3\u00a7a contra a fam\u00c3\u00adlia para arrancar colabora\u00c3\u00a7\u00c3\u00a3o. A\u00c3\u00ad dela\u00c3\u00a7\u00c3\u00a3o preso podia, servia e era tratada como instrumento leg\u00c3\u00adtimo. <br><br>Agora, quando surge a possibilidade de uma dela\u00c3\u00a7\u00c3\u00a3o que pode encostar em Alexandre? <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/Bgpxhx7Vw2\">pic.twitter.com\/Bgpxhx7Vw2<\/a><\/p>? Edison V. Campos (@Edison_vander) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/Edison_vander\/status\/2042002467924427106?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">April 8, 2026<\/a><\/blockquote> <script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><figcaption>When the plea bargain involved Mauro Cid, imprisonment, maximum pressure, and even threats against his family were justified to extract cooperation. Back then, a plea bargain from a prisoner was acceptable, useful, and treated as a legitimate instrument.\r\n<\/p><p>\r\nNow, when the possibility arises of a plea bargain that could implicate Alexandre de Moraes, there&#8217;s a sudden rush to vote on a 2021 action and limit the effects of plea bargains.\r\n<\/p><p>\r\nExcuse me, but this has nothing to do with defending guarantees; it&#8217;s blatant opportunism. And it&#8217;s this kind of villainy that is destroying the trust of any minimally honest Brazilian in the country.<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div><hr>\r\n<\/p><p>\r\n<b>The Supreme Court believes that public pressure for the investigation of ministers will not last long.<\/b>\r\n<\/p><p>\r\nSchuler lists recent scandals involving Supreme Court justices (Moraes, Toffoli, and Nunes Marques): acquisitions of properties worth more than R$ 23 million in 5 years, flights on private jets, hiring of law firms, conversations with Daniel Vorcaro, and exchange of messages.<\/p><p>\r\nHe explains why nothing is progressing:\r\n<\/p><p>\r\n&#8211; The Attorney General&#8217;s Office (PGR) shows no sign of an investigation;\r\n<\/p><p>\r\n&#8211; There is a &#8220;solid alliance&#8221; (legal, institutional, and political) between the Attorney General&#8217;s Office (PGR), the majority of the Supreme Federal Court (STF) (especially Moraes), and Congress (Senator Columbre);\r\n<\/p><p>\r\n&#8211; No request for a Parliamentary Commission of Inquiry (CPI) or impeachment process is moving forward in the Senate;\r\n<\/p><p>\r\n&#8211; Even if Daniel Vorcaro&#8217;s testimony mentions ministers, Andr\u00c3\u00a9 Mendon\u00c3\u00a7a may want to investigate, but it depends on the Attorney General&#8217;s Office and the majority of the STF, which &#8220;will hardly corroborate it.&#8221;\r\n<\/p><p>\r\nSchuler contrasts this with the treatment given to those investigated on January 8th: there, the STF used a broad criterion (&#8220;body of work,&#8221; association, rhetoric).<\/p><p>\r\nFor the ministers, the criterion is the opposite: only &#8220;patent illegality&#8221; counts.<\/p><p>\r\nHe concludes that the STF is betting on a &#8220;flash in the pan&#8221; &#8211; popular indignation passes, the professional media has tolerated violations since 2019, and, with the 2026 elections approaching, the discourse of &#8220;threat to democracy&#8221; is dominating again.\r\n<\/p><p>\r\nScSchuler\u00c2\u00b4s huler&#8217;s entire video (almost 4 minutes) is a cold and pragmatic analysis.<\/p><p>\r\nHe doesn&#8217;t accuse anyone of a crime, but demonstrates, with facts, that the system is shielded from any investigation that reaches those in power.<\/p><p>\r\nThe implicit message is clear: the Supreme Federal Court (STF) counts on the Brazilian people forgetting.\r\n<\/p><p>\r\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure><blockquote class=\"twitter-tweet\" data-media-max-width=\"560\"><p lang=\"pt\" dir=\"ltr\">&#8220;FERNANDO SCHULER: O SUPREMO acredita que a PRESS\u00c3\u0192O da POPULA\u00c3\u2021\u00c3\u0192O pela INVESTIGA\u00c3\u2021\u00c3\u0192O de MINISTROS n\u00c3\u00a3o durar\u00c3\u00a1 muito tempo.<br><br>\u00c3\u2030 isso a\u00c3\u00ad, gente. Os PODRES est\u00c3\u00a3o acreditando que n\u00c3\u00b3s, o POVO, esqueceremos todos os ESC\u00c3\u201aNDALOS que presenciamos nos \u00c3\u00baltimos meses e que tudo terminar\u00c3\u00a1 em? <a href=\"https:\/\/t.co\/0t3Kdqgd7j\">pic.twitter.com\/0t3Kdqgd7j<\/a><\/p>? Michel c. sales (@MichelcSales) <a href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/MichelcSales\/status\/2041896423692624233?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw\">April 8, 2026<\/a><\/blockquote> <script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><figcaption>&#8220;FERNANDO SCHULER: The SUPREME COURT believes that the PUBLIC PRESSURE for the INVESTIGATION of MINISTERS will not last long.\r\n<\/p><p>\r\nThat&#8217;s it, folks. The CORRUPT ones believe that we, the PEOPLE, will forget all the SCANDALS we have witnessed in recent months and that everything will end in nothing.\r\n<\/p><p>\r\nI can&#8217;t speak for you, but I will never forget. Even if nothing is resolved this year, next year, with a new SENATE (God willing), I will continue to demand the IMPEACHMENT of all these ELEMENTS who have been SPITTING in our faces for 7 years.&#8221;<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div><hr>\r\n<\/p><p>\r\n<b>The attempt to hide and protect<\/b>\r\n<\/p><p>\r\nWatching both videos, it becomes evident what the authors of the posts want to highlight:\r\n<\/p><p>\r\n1. Selective hypocrisy &#8211; Plea bargaining is a powerful weapon when used against political opponents (Mauro Cid).<\/p><p>\r\nWhen it can affect the STF itself, it becomes a &#8220;threat to guarantees&#8221; and deserves urgent limitation.\r\n<\/p><p>\r\n2. Caste protection &#8211; The &#8220;rush&#8221; to vote on the 2021 action coincides exactly with the moment when plea bargains (like Vorcaro&#8217;s) could expose dangerous relationships between ministers, businessmen, and political power.<\/p><p>\r\nAt the same time, Schuler exposes the STF&#8217;s explicit bet: &#8220;the people forget&#8221;.<\/p><p>\r\n3. Institutional Shielding &#8211; The Attorney General&#8217;s Office (PGR), the Supreme Federal Court (STF), and Congress form a bloc that prevents Parliamentary Inquiry Commissions (CPIs), impeachment, or serious investigations.<\/p><p>\r\nThe criterion of &#8220;legality&#8221; is applied in opposite ways depending on who is in the dock.\r\n<\/p><p>\r\nThe posts are not mere conspiratorial opinion.<\/p><p>\r\nThey juxtapose recent facts (Moraes&#8217; request to limit plea bargains + Schuler&#8217;s analysis of the bet on forgetting) and show the same movement: hiding what could incriminate the top of the Brazilian Judiciary and politics.\r\n<\/p><p>\r\nIf the STF truly believes that popular pressure &#8220;won&#8217;t last long,&#8221; as Schuler says, Brazilians who watch these videos have the chance to prove otherwise.<\/p><p>\r\nMemory is not optional.<\/p><p>\r\nThe demand for transparency and accountability isn&#8217;t either.<\/p><p>\r\nCasuistry, when exposed like this, loses its power.<\/p><p>\r\nAnd that&#8217;s exactly what the two posts are doing: preventing forgetting.<\/p><p><\/p><p>\r\n<hr>\r\n\r\n<p style=\"text-align:right\"><em>Published in 04\/09\/2026 05h48<\/em><\/p>\r\n<hr>\r\n<p style=\"text-align:right\"><em><a href=\"https:\/\/iustitia.com.br\/?page_id=3338\">Portuguese version<\/a><\/em><\/p>\r\n<hr>\r\n\r\n\t\t<p>Text adapted by AI (Grok) and translated via Google API in the English version. Images from public image libraries or credits in the caption.<\/p>\r\n\t\t<hr>\r\n\t\t<p>Reference article:<\/p>\r\n\t\t\r\n\t\t\r\n\r\n\r\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\"><li><a href=\"https:\/\/x.com\/mirsadeye\/status\/2041895442233909737\" target=\"_blank\">https:\/\/x.com\/mirsadeye\/status\/2041895442233909737<\/a><\/li><\/ul>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator is-style-wide\"\/>\r\n\r\n<div style=\"position: buttonline;\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/vendedoradesonhos.com.br\/rodape_sites.php?arg=41921\" frameborder=\"0\" height=\"420px\" width=\"100%\"><\/iframe><\/div>\r\n<div style=\"position: buttonline;\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/vendedoradesonhos.com.br\/comentario_navegacao.php?arg=41921\" frameborder=\"0\" height=\"500px\" width=\"100%\"><\/iframe><\/div>\r\n<div style=\"position:absolute; width:40%; height:70px; top:-70px; left:0px;\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/vendedoradesonhos.com.br\/oferta_site_esq.php?arg=41921\" frameborder=\"0\" height=\"100%\" width=\"100%\"><\/iframe><\/div>\r\n<div style=\"position:absolute; width:40%; height:70px; top:-70px; right:0px;\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/vendedoradesonhos.com.br\/oferta_site_dir.php?arg=41921\" frameborder=\"0\" height=\"100%;\" width=\"100%\"><\/iframe><\/div>\r\n\r\n\r\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure><iframe loading=\"lazy\" src=\"https:\/\/vendedoradesonhos.com.br\/oferta_site_centralus.php\" width=\"100%\" height=\"330\" frameborder=\"0\"><\/iframe><figcaption>{teste}<\/figcaption><\/figure><\/div><hr>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":44,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-1055","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/iustitia.com.br\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1055","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/iustitia.com.br\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/iustitia.com.br\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iustitia.com.br\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iustitia.com.br\/en\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1055"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/iustitia.com.br\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1055\/revisions"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/iustitia.com.br\/en\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/44"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/iustitia.com.br\/en\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1055"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}